If an employee is resigning in “Haste” because of a workplace argument or disagreement, then it is recommended that you give them time to cool down and then check that they are still wanting to resign. The Fair Work Commission noted in case law principles that:
- It may not be reasonable to immediately accept a resignation where there are special circumstances;
- Special circumstances may include words said in anger, under undue pressure or the intellectual capacity of employee;
- Where there are special circumstances, employers should allow a reasonable period of time to pass. The employer may need to enquire whether the employee actually intended to resign;
- Given the special circumstances, whether an employee intended to resign will be judged objectively by the courts; and
- Where a resignation is given and the intention is unambiguous, the employer is not required to make further enquiries.

If an employer fails to take these steps and simply accepts a resignation made in the ‘heat of the moment’, it may be subject to an unfair dismissal application against them. Section 386(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) distinguishes between a genuine resignation and one where an employee has felt forced to resign ‘because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer’, which is in fact considered a dismissal at the initiative of the employer. In the case of Minato v Palmer Corporation (1995), a retail employee stormed out of the workplace saying to her supervisor that she could “shove the f***ing job up her a***”. When the employer refused to accept the employee’s withdrawal of her resignation, it was found to be ‘harsh, unjust and unreasonable’ and, therefore, an unfair dismissal under section 385(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Navigating employee terminations can be tricky, but we’ve got you covered! 💼

